1966 Alvis TF vs. 1972 AMC Matador
To start off, 1972 AMC Matador is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 4,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 150 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Matador (332 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1972 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 1972 AMC Matador | |
Make | Alvis | AMC |
Model | TF | Matador |
Year Released | 1966 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 4982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 332 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3000 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 74 L |