1966 Alvis TF vs. 1973 Citroen DS
To start off, 1973 Citroen DS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alvis TF (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1973 Citroen DS. (103 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alvis TF should accelerate faster than 1973 Citroen DS.
Because 1966 Alvis TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alvis TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Citroen DS. (152 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Citroen DS.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 1973 Citroen DS | |
Make | Alvis | Citroen |
Model | TF | DS |
Year Released | 1966 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3130 mm |