1966 Alvis TF vs. 1975 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 1975 Datsun 280Z is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 150 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Datsun 280Z. (221 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Datsun 280Z.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 1975 Datsun 280Z | |
Make | Alvis | Datsun |
Model | TF | 280Z |
Year Released | 1966 | 1975 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4399 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2304 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |