1966 Alvis TF vs. 1976 Volvo 260
To start off, 1976 Volvo 260 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alvis TF (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 260. (148 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alvis TF should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 260.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 260. (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 1976 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Alvis | Volvo |
Model | TF | 260 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2660 mm |