1966 Alvis TF vs. 1981 Audi 80
To start off, 1981 Audi 80 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alvis TF (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1981 Audi 80. (136 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alvis TF should accelerate faster than 1981 Audi 80.
Because 1981 Audi 80 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alvis TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi 80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Audi 80. (176 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alvis TF | 1981 Audi 80 | |
| Make | Alvis | Audi |
| Model | TF | 80 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 136 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Torque | 247 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2550 mm |
