1966 Alvis TF vs. 1982 Buick Century
To start off, 1982 Buick Century is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Buick Century is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alvis TF (150 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1982 Buick Century. (85 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alvis TF should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Century.
Because 1966 Alvis TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alvis TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Buick Century. (224 Nm). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Buick Century.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alvis TF | 1982 Buick Century | |
| Make | Alvis | Buick |
| Model | TF | Century |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 4300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 85 HP |
| Torque | 247 Nm | 224 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4803 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1364 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2662 mm |
