1966 Alvis TF vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 1982 Renault 9 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alvis TF (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alvis TF should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9.
Because 1966 Alvis TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alvis TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 9. (100 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 9.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Alvis | Renault |
Model | TF | 9 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 100 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2440 mm |