1966 Alvis TF vs. 1985 Audi 200
To start off, 1985 Audi 200 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alvis TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 200 (252 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1985 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 1985 Audi 200 | |
Make | Alvis | Audi |
Model | TF | 200 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 252 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 80 L |