1966 Alvis TF vs. 1988 Audi 90
To start off, 1988 Audi 90 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alvis TF (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1988 Audi 90. (114 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alvis TF should accelerate faster than 1988 Audi 90.
Because 1966 Alvis TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alvis TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Audi 90, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Audi 90. (172 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Audi 90.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 1988 Audi 90 | |
Make | Alvis | Audi |
Model | TF | 90 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2550 mm |