1966 Alvis TF vs. 1994 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 1994 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Land Rover Range Rover (223 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Because 1994 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alvis TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Land Rover Range Rover (381 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1994 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 1994 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Alvis | Land Rover |
Model | TF | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1966 | 1994 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 4554 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 223 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 381 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2750 mm |