1966 Alvis TF vs. 1995 Volvo 960
To start off, 1995 Volvo 960 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Volvo 960 (168 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Volvo 960 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Volvo 960. (233 Nm @ 4550 RPM). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Volvo 960.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 1995 Volvo 960 | |
Make | Alvis | Volvo |
Model | TF | 960 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2473 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4550 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2780 mm |