1966 Alvis TF vs. 1998 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 1998 SsangYong Korando is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 SsangYong Korando (217 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Because 1998 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alvis TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 SsangYong Korando (307 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1998 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 1998 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Alvis | SsangYong |
Model | TF | Korando |
Year Released | 1966 | 1998 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 307 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1850 mm |