1966 Alvis TF vs. 1998 Toyota Caldina
To start off, 1998 Toyota Caldina is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Toyota Caldina (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Toyota Caldina should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Because 1998 Toyota Caldina is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alvis TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Toyota Caldina will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Toyota Caldina (324 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1998 Toyota Caldina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 1998 Toyota Caldina | |
Make | Alvis | Toyota |
Model | TF | Caldina |
Year Released | 1966 | 1998 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 324 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |