1966 Alvis TF vs. 1999 Citroen Xantia
To start off, 1999 Citroen Xantia is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alvis TF (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1999 Citroen Xantia. (109 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alvis TF should accelerate faster than 1999 Citroen Xantia.
Because 1966 Alvis TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alvis TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Citroen Xantia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Citroen Xantia. (161 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Citroen Xantia.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 1999 Citroen Xantia | |
Make | Alvis | Citroen |
Model | TF | Xantia |
Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1761 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 161 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2750 mm |