1966 Alvis TF vs. 1999 Jeep Commander
To start off, 1999 Jeep Commander is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher.
Because 1999 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alvis TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alvis TF | 1999 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Alvis | Jeep |
| Model | TF | Commander |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1770 mm |
