1966 Alvis TF vs. 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112
To start off, 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 (403 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 253 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 (580 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 333 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alvis TF | 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 | |
| Make | Alvis | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | TF | C 112 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 5987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 403 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 247 Nm | 580 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2710 mm |
