1966 Alvis TF vs. 2000 BMW 328
To start off, 2000 BMW 328 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 328 (201 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 328 (279 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm). This means 2000 BMW 328 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 2000 BMW 328 | |
Make | Alvis | BMW |
Model | TF | 328 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2977 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 279 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2730 mm |