1966 Alvis TF vs. 2000 Chevrolet SSR
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (300 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (481 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 2000 Chevrolet SSR | |
Make | Alvis | Chevrolet |
Model | TF | SSR |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 5324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 247 Nm | 481 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2950 mm |