1966 Alvis TF vs. 2000 Lada 110
To start off, 2000 Lada 110 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alvis TF (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2000 Lada 110. (70 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alvis TF should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada 110.
Because 1966 Alvis TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alvis TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada 110. (115 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 2000 Lada 110 | |
Make | Alvis | Lada |
Model | TF | 110 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 43 L |