1966 Alvis TF vs. 2000 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2000 Toyota Mark II is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Mark II (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Because 2000 Toyota Mark II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alvis TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Mark II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Mark II. (200 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alvis TF | 2000 Toyota Mark II | |
| Make | Alvis | Toyota |
| Model | TF | Mark II |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 247 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 70 L |
