1966 Alvis TF vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alvis TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (217 Nm). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alvis TF | 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Alvis | Chevrolet |
| Model | TF | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 247 Nm | 217 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2210 mm |
