1966 Alvis TF vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Verada
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi Verada is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Mitsubishi Verada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mitsubishi Verada (208 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Verada should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Because 1966 Alvis TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alvis TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Verada, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mitsubishi Verada (317 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2001 Mitsubishi Verada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 2001 Mitsubishi Verada | |
Make | Alvis | Mitsubishi |
Model | TF | Verada |
Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 317 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2730 mm |