1966 Alvis TF vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alvis TF | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Alvis | Toyota |
| Model | TF | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 4700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 247 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 45 L |
