1966 Alvis TF vs. 2002 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2002 Ford Explorer is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Explorer (210 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Explorer (335 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 2002 Ford Explorer | |
Make | Alvis | Ford |
Model | TF | Explorer |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 4009 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 335 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 85 L |