1966 Alvis TF vs. 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton
To start off, 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 4,921 cc (10 cylinders), 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton (309 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Because 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alvis TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton (750 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 503 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton | |
Make | Alvis | Volkswagen |
Model | TF | Phaeton |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 4921 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 309 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 750 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 90 L |