1966 Alvis TF vs. 2004 Audi RS6
To start off, 2004 Audi RS6 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 294 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Because 2004 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alvis TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi RS6 (560 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2004 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 2004 Audi RS6 | |
Make | Alvis | Audi |
Model | TF | RS6 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 4163 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 444 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 560 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 82 L |