1966 Alvis TF vs. 2004 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2004 GMC Yukon is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Yukon (286 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Yukon (441 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2004 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 2004 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Alvis | GMC |
Model | TF | Yukon |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 5328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 286 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 441 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3280 mm |