1966 Alvis TF vs. 2005 Citroen C5
To start off, 2005 Citroen C5 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alvis TF (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C5. (131 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alvis TF should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C5.
Because 1966 Alvis TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alvis TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen C5. (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alvis TF | 2005 Citroen C5 | |
| Make | Alvis | Citroen |
| Model | TF | C5 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1997 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 131 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 247 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 66 L |
