1966 Alvis TF vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alvis TF (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alvis TF should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (174 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Alvis | Ford |
Model | TF | Ranger |
Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 21.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2990 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 80 L |