1966 Alvis TF vs. 2009 Zenvo ST1
To start off, 2009 Zenvo ST1 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 7,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Zenvo ST1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Zenvo ST1 (1,104 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 954 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Zenvo ST1 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Zenvo ST1 (1,430 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 1183 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2009 Zenvo ST1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alvis TF | 2009 Zenvo ST1 | |
| Make | Alvis | Zenvo |
| Model | TF | ST1 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 7000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 1104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Torque | 247 Nm | 1430 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4665 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2041 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1198 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3055 mm |
