1966 Alvis TF vs. 2010 BMW X5
To start off, 2010 BMW X5 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. Both 1966 Alvis TF and 2010 BMW X5 are equipped with a 2,993 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW X5 (304 HP @ 440 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Because 2010 BMW X5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alvis TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW X5 (600 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2010 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 2010 BMW X5 | |
Make | Alvis | BMW |
Model | TF | X5 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 304 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 440 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 600 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4857 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1933 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1776 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2934 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 85 L |