1966 Alvis TF vs. 2010 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2010 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda RX-8. (215 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alvis TF | 2010 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Alvis | Mazda |
| Model | TF | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 247 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1341 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 64 L |
