1966 Alvis TF vs. 2010 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2010 Subaru Outback is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Subaru Outback (256 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Because 2010 Subaru Outback is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alvis TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Subaru Outback (335 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2010 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 2010 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Alvis | Subaru |
Model | TF | Outback |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 335 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2741 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 70 L |