1966 Alvis TF vs. 2010 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2010 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota RAV4 (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota RAV4 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Because 2010 Toyota RAV4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alvis TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota RAV4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Toyota RAV4. (233 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Toyota RAV4.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 2010 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Alvis | Toyota |
Model | TF | RAV4 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1854 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2659 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |