1966 Alvis TF vs. 2011 Nissan 370Z
To start off, 2011 Nissan 370Z is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Nissan 370Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan 370Z (332 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan 370Z should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan 370Z (366 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan 370Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 2011 Nissan 370Z | |
Make | Alvis | Nissan |
Model | TF | 370Z |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 332 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4247 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1326 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 72 L |