1966 Alvis TF vs. 2011 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2011 Suzuki Equator is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Suzuki Equator (152 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Suzuki Equator. (232 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Suzuki Equator.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 2011 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Alvis | Suzuki |
Model | TF | Equator |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 80 L |