1966 Alvis TF vs. 2012 GMC Savana
To start off, 2012 GMC Savana is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 GMC Savana (260 HP @ 3100 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 GMC Savana (711 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 464 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2012 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 2012 GMC Savana | |
Make | Alvis | GMC |
Model | TF | Savana |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 6600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 3100 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 711 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5692 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2012 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 2070 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3429 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 117 L |