1966 Alvis TF vs. 2012 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2012 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Lincoln Navigator (310 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Lincoln Navigator (494 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2012 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 2012 Lincoln Navigator | |
Make | Alvis | Lincoln |
Model | TF | Navigator |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 494 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5672 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2002 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1984 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3327 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 127 L |