1966 Alvis TF vs. 2012 Mazda 3

To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alvis TF (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 3. (148 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alvis TF should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 3.

Because 1966 Alvis TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alvis TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 3 (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Alvis TF 2012 Mazda 3
Make Alvis Mazda
Model TF 3
Year Released 1966 2012
Body Type Convertible Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2993 cc 2184 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 150 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 247 Nm 360 Nm
Torque RPM 3750 RPM 1800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2639 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 55 L