1966 Alvis TF vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo XC60 (325 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Because 2012 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alvis TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC60 (479 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Alvis | Volvo |
Model | TF | XC60 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 325 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 479 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2748 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 70 L |