1966 Alvis TF vs. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER

To start off, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER (464 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 314 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER (637 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Alvis TF 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER
Make Alvis Dodge
Model TF CHALLENGER
Year Released 1966 2013
Body Type Convertible Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2993 cc 6400 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 150 HP 464 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 247 Nm 637 Nm
Torque RPM 3750 RPM 4300 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 5023 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1923 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1449 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2946 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 72 L