1966 Alvis TF vs. 2013 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2013 Ford Taurus is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Taurus (360 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Because 2013 Ford Taurus is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alvis TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Taurus will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Taurus (475 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alvis TF | 2013 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Alvis | Ford |
| Model | TF | Taurus |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 360 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 247 Nm | 475 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5154 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2177 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2868 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 72 L |
