1966 Alvis TF vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C (245 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alvis TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C (340 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 2013 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Alvis | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | TF | C |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 245 HP |
Torque | 247 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4591 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2008 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1445 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2760 mm |