1966 Aston Martin DB4 vs. 1999 Holden Maloo
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Aston Martin DB4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Aston Martin DB4 would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Aston Martin DB4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Aston Martin DB4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Aston Martin DB4. (360 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Aston Martin DB4.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Aston Martin DB4 | 1999 Holden Maloo | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Holden |
| Model | DB4 | Maloo |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3670 cc | 5699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 360 Nm | 542 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
