1966 Audi Variant vs. 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1966 Audi Variant.
Because 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Audi Variant | 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Variant | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 1966 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1696 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 2150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3130 mm |