1966 Audi Variant vs. 1978 Toyota Celica

To start off, 1978 Toyota Celica is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 1,967 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Toyota Celica (118 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1966 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1966 Audi Variant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Toyota Celica weights approximately 30 kg more than 1966 Audi Variant. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Toyota Celica (152 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Audi Variant. (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1978 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Audi Variant.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Audi Variant 1978 Toyota Celica
Make Audi Toyota
Model Variant Celica
Year Released 1966 1978
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1696 cc 1967 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 71 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 128 Nm 152 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 5200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 88.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84.4 mm 80 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.6:1 9.7:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 1070 kg 1100 kg
Vehicle Length 4390 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2500 mm 2510 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]