1966 Audi Variant vs. 1981 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1966 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1966 Audi Variant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 80 kg more than 1966 Audi Variant. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Audi Variant | 1981 Cadillac Cimarron | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | Variant | Cimarron |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1696 cc | 2844 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2580 mm |
