1966 Audi Variant vs. 1987 Mazda 626
To start off, 1987 Mazda 626 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Mazda 626 (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1966 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1966 Audi Variant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Mazda 626 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1966 Audi Variant. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Mazda 626 (134 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Audi Variant. (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1987 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Audi Variant | 1987 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | Variant | 626 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1696 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2580 mm |