1966 Audi Variant vs. 1992 Renault Racoon
To start off, 1992 Renault Racoon is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Renault Racoon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Audi Variant (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1992 Renault Racoon. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Audi Variant should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Racoon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Audi Variant weights approximately 65 kg more than 1992 Renault Racoon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Renault Racoon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Audi Variant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Racoon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Audi Variant (128 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Racoon. (107 Nm). This means 1966 Audi Variant will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Racoon.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Audi Variant | 1992 Renault Racoon | |
| Make | Audi | Renault |
| Model | Variant | Racoon |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1696 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 107 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1005 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2770 mm |
