1966 Audi Variant vs. 1996 Toyota Carina
To start off, 1996 Toyota Carina is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Carina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Carina (82 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1966 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Carina should accelerate faster than 1966 Audi Variant.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Audi Variant | 1996 Toyota Carina | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | Variant | Carina |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1696 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 82 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 23.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
